Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorUnidosUS et al.
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T16:27:55Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T16:27:55Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-27
dc.identifier.urihttp://publications.nclr.org/handle/123456789/2013
dc.description.abstractUnidosUS joined 41 leading civil rights, public health, and other groups in support of San Francisco and San Francisco County, the State of California, and the State of Washington in their suit against U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ proposed regulation to modify the “public charge” test (“public charge”). Public charge would create a de facto wealth test for eligible immigrants seeking to apply for legal permanent residency (green card) and/or extensions to certain visa classes. Research overwhelmingly shows that rules like public charge disproportionately impact immigrants of color and harm U.S. citizen children in immigrant families. UnidosUS has raised alarm over the Trump administration’s suppression of Latino and immigrant communities and works tirelessly to oppose its attacks on legal immigration and American families.
dc.description.abstracthttps://medium.com/@WeAreUnidosUS/the-shadow-war-to-reshape-the-face-of-america-7c540750e495
dc.description.abstracthttp://publications.unidosus.org/handle/123456789/2014
dc.description.abstracthttps://medium.com/@WeAreUnidosUS/trumps-public-charge-proposal-offers-little-to-be-thankful-for-17b81a10a5d
dc.description.abstracthttps://blog.unidosus.org/2019/08/20/public-charge-harms/
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherUnidosUSen
dc.subjectImmigrationen
dc.subjectPublic Chargeen
dc.subjectPolicyen
dc.titleAmicus Curiae Brief: AAJC, AALDEF, NWLC & 38 Civil Rights Groupsen
dc.typeOtheren


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record